Labor Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Quint, et al v. Vail Resorts
as 23-1404
Plaintiff: RANDY DEAN QUINT, JOHN LINN and MARK MOLINA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: VAIL RESORTS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Brock v. Flowers Foods, et al
as 23-1182
Plaintiff / Appellee: ANGELO BROCK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: FLOWERS FOODS, INC., a Georgia limited liability company, FLOWERS BAKERIES, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company and FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF DENVER, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company
Stout v. Central Plastics, Inc.
as 6:2023cv01057
Plaintiff: Jerrod Stout, And all others similarly situated, Bryce Seymour and others
Defendant: Central Plastics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hamilton v. Amazon.com Services
as 23-1082
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL HAMILTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Menocal, et al v. GEO Group
as 22-1409
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALEJANDRO MENOCAL, MARCOS BRAMBILA, LOURDES ARGUETA and others
Defendant / Appellant: THE GEO GROUP, INC.
Quint, et al v. Vail Resorts We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1226
Plaintiff / Appellant: RANDY DEAN QUINT, JOHN LINN and MARK MOLINA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: VAIL RESORTS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Brayman, et al v. Keypoint Government Solutions
as 22-1168
Plaintiff / Appellee: RACHEL BRAYMAN, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals, ADRIANA PONCE, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals and DANA MCCARTHY, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals
Defendant / Appellant: KEYPOINT GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Matney, et al v. Barrick Gold of North America, et al
as 22-4045
Plaintiff / Appellant: COLE MATNEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and PAUL WATTS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: BARRICK GOLD OF NORTH AMERICA, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BARRICK GOLD OF NORTH AMERICA and BARRICK U.S. SUBSIDIARIES BENEFITS COMMITTEE
Brayman, et al v. Keypoint Government Solutions
as 22-1118
Plaintiff / Appellee: RACHEL BRAYMAN, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals, ADRIANA PONCE, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals and DANA MCCARTHY, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals
Defendant / Appellant: KEYPOINT GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Harrison v. Envision Management Holding, Inc. Board, et al
as 22-1098
Plaintiff / Appellee: ROBERT HARRISON, on behalf of himself and ROBERT HARRISON, on behalf of himself, the Envision Management Holding, Inc. ESOP, and all other similarly situated individuals.
Defendant / Appellant: ENVISION MANAGEMENT HOLDING, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ENVISION MANAGEMENT HOLDING, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMMITTEE, ARGENT TRUST COMPANY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?