Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Matney, et al v. Barrick Gold of North America, et al
as 22-4045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLE MATNEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and PAUL WATTS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
BARRICK GOLD OF NORTH AMERICA, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BARRICK GOLD OF NORTH AMERICA and BARRICK U.S. SUBSIDIARIES BENEFITS COMMITTEE
Harrison v. Envision Management Holding, Inc. Board, et al
as 22-1098
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT HARRISON, on behalf of himself and ROBERT HARRISON, on behalf of himself, the Envision Management Holding, Inc. ESOP, and all other similarly situated individuals.
Defendant / Appellant:
ENVISION MANAGEMENT HOLDING, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ENVISION MANAGEMENT HOLDING, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMMITTEE, ARGENT TRUST COMPANY and others
Medina v. Catholic Health Initiatives, et al
as 16-1005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANEEN MEDINA, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf fothe CHI Plans
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES, GERALDINE BEDNASH, MAUREEN COMER and others
Fulghum, et al v. Embarq Corporation, et al
as 13-3230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS FULGHUM, DORSEY DANIEL, JOHN DOUGLAS HOLLINGSWORTH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
EMBARQ CORPORATION, EMBARQ RETIREE MEDICAL PLAN, SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION and others
Bigley v. Ciber, Inc.
as 13-1243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA BIGLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CIBER, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY COVERAGE FOR:, Class I: All salaried and administrative employees who work 40 hours per week, and class II: all other salaried and administrative qualified full-time employees who work 32-40 hours per week
Pikas v. Williams Companies, Inc., et al
as 13-5049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH L. PIKAS, on behalf of himself and all other persons similary situated
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC., and its Benefits Committee and Administrative Committee and Administrator of the Williams Pension Plan and WILLIAMS PENSION PLAN
Pikas v. Williams Companies, et al
as 13-5043
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. PIKAS, on behalf of himself and all other persons similary situated
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC., and its Benefits Committee and Administrative Committee and Administrator of the Williams Pension Plan and WILLIAMS PENSION PLAN
Jensen, et al v. Solvay Chemicals, Inc., et al
as 11-8092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE JENSEN and DONALD D. GOFF, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
SOLVAY CHEMICALS, INC., SOLVAY AMERICA, INC. and SOLVAY AMERICA COMPANIES PENSION PLAN
Tomlinson, et al v. El Paso Corp, et al
as 10-1385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE TOMLINSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ALICE BALLESTEROS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and GARY MUCKELROY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
EL PASO CORPORATION and EL PASO PENSION PLAN
Jensen, et al v. Solvay Chemicals, Inc., et al
as 09-8082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE JENSEN and DONALD D. GOFF, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
SOLVAY CHEMICALS, INC., SOLVAY AMERICA, INC. and SOLVAY AMERICA COMPANIES PENSION PLAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
