Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Building Service 32BJ Pension Fund v. Landing B Associates, LLC a/k/a Landing B Property Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02112
Plaintiff:
Building Service 32BJ Pension Fund
Defendant:
Landing B Associates, LLC a/k/a Landing B Property Associates, LLC and ABC Companies 1 - 10 (all other trades or businesses under common control with Landing B Associates, LLC a/k/a Landing B Property Associates, LLC)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Singh v. Deloitte LLP
as 23-1108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rupinder Singh, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jeffrey S. Popkin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Joni Walker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Deloitte LLP, The Board of Directors of Deloitte LLP, The Retirement Plan Committee of Deloitte LLP and others
Building Service 32BJ Pension Fund v. PCL Union LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04467
Plaintiff:
Building Service 32BJ Pension Fund
Defendant:
PCL Union LLC, PCL - Corners LLC and ABC Companies 1 - 10 (all other trades or businesses under common control with PCL Union LLC and PCL - Corners LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Building Service 32BJ Pension Fund v. Bowne House Owners Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv03940
Plaintiff:
Building Service 32BJ Pension Fund
Defendant:
Bowne House Owners Corp. and ABC Companies 1-10 (all other trades or businesses under common control with Bowne House Owners Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Trustees of The National Retirement Fund v. Safety Wear, Inc.
as 7:2023cv02718
Plaintiff:
National Retirement Fund and Trustees of The National Retirement Fund,
Defendant:
Safety Wear, Inc., JOHN DOES 1-10 (all other trades or businesses under common control with Safety Wear, Inc.), Safety Wear, Inc. doing business as Midwest Linen & Uniform Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Pessin v. JPMorgan Chase U.S. Benefits Executive
as 23-25
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Pessin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase U.S. Benefits Executive, as Plan Administrator of the JPMorgan Chase Retirement Plan, Board of Directors of JPMorgan Chase Bank and J.P. Morgan Chase & Company and JPMorgan Chase Retirement Plan
Lloyd v. Argent Trust Company
as 22-3116
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jamaal Lloyd, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the W BBQ Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Anastasia Jenkins
Defendant / Appellant:
Argent Trust Company, Herbert Wetanson, Gregor Wetanson and others
Radcliffe v. Aetna, Inc.
as 22-2757
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raymond Radcliffe, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Carol Flaim, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Aetna, Inc., CVS Health Corporation, Aetna Benefits Finance Committee and others
Defendant:
Frank M. Clark, Betty Z. Cohen, Jeffrey Garten and others
Grosso v. AT&T Pension Benefit Plan
as 22-1701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vincent C. Grosso, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated and Patricia M. Wing, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T Pension Benefit Plan and AT&T Services, Inc., as Plan Administrator
Building Service 32BJ Pension Fund v. Whitehouse Estates, Inc.
as 1:2022cv05412
Plaintiff:
Building Service 32BJ Pension Fund
Defendant:
Whitehouse Estates, Inc., Whitehpuse Estates, Inc. and ABC Companies 1 - 10
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
ABC Companies 1 - 10 (all other trades or businesses under common control with Whitehouse Estates, Inc.)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
