Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 212
Juste v. Sessions et al
as 1:2017cv01189
Petitioner: Andre Juste
Respondent: Jeff B. Sessions, III, Thomas P. Brophy and Robert Judge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Juste v. Bonk, et al
as 1:2017cv01205
Plaintiff: Andre Juste
Defendant: Denise M. Bonk and Carla Hengerer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juste v. Bonk et al
as 1:2017cv01173
Plaintiff: Andre Juste
Defendant: Denise M. Bonk, John B. Reid and U.S. Department of Justice Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juste v. Robert
as 1:2017cv01141
Petitioner: Andre Juste
Respondent: Robert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Juste v. Deacon et al
as 1:2017cv01134
Plaintiff: Andre Juste
Defendant: Molly Deacon, Immigration Court and Immigration Reid Reid B Joh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01103
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Juste v. Robert
as 1:2017cv06371
Petitioner: Andre Juste
Respondent: Warden Judge Robert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JUSTE v. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2017cv01079
Defendant: Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Michael T Phillips, Todd L. Tryon and others
Plaintiff: Andre Juste
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juste v. Secretary, U.S. Department of State et al
as 2:2017cv14366
Plaintiff: Andre Juste
Defendant: Secretary, U.S. Department of State, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and Secretary, Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juste v. Krome North Processing Services et al
as 1:2017cv23654
Petitioner: Andre Juste
Respondent: Krome North Processing Services and Warden
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?