Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00967
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Willard H. Dere, Catherine Friedman and others
Waterman v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Willard H. Dere, Catherine Friedman and others
Whitfield v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00973
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitefield and Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Willard H. Dere, Catherine Friedman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Porter v. Hsieh et al
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Porter
Defendant:
Anthony Hsieh, Patrick Flanagan, Nicole Carrillo and others
Nominal Defendant:
loanDepot, Inc.
IN RE LOANDEPOT, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 1:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Tuyet Vu and Jocelyn Porter
Defendant:
Anthony Hsieh, Patrick Flanagan, Nicole Carrillo and others
Nominal Defendant:
loanDepot, Inc.
Sarabia v. Burns et al
as 1:2021cv01010
Plaintiff:
Evaristo Sarabia
Defendant:
Stephen S. Burns, Julio C. Rodriquez, Michael Fabian and others
Nominal Defendant:
Lordstown Motors Corp.
Patterson v. Lordstown Motors Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv00910
Nominal Defendant:
Lordstown Motors Corp.
Defendant:
Keith A. Feldman, David T. Hamamoto, Julio C. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Claude L. Patterson
Kelley et al v. Burns et al
as 1:2021cv00724
Nominal Defendant:
Lordstown Motors Corp.
Defendant:
Keith A. Feldman, Martin J. Rucidlo, David T. Hamamoto and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert Stotler and Alicia Kelley
In re Lordstown Motors Corp. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2021cv00604
Nominal Defendant:
Lordstown Motors Corp.
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Cohen, David M. Cohen, Herbert Stotler and others
Defendant:
Keith A. Feldman, Martin J. Rucidlo, David T. Hamamoto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
