Cases 41 - 50 of 61
NGUYEN et al v. UDALL et al
as 1:2022cv02396
Plaintiff:
TU CAM NGUYEN and Nga Tuyet HOANG
Defendant:
TOM UDALL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES CONSULATE GENERAL IN AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
PEEVSKI et al v. YELLEN et al
as 1:2022cv02334
Plaintiff:
DELYAN SLAVCHEV PEEVSKI, INT LTD EEOD, INTRUST PLC EAD and others
Defendant:
JANET YELLEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, ANDREA M. GACKI and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PARACHA v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02567
Petitioner:
MR. SAIFULLAH PARACHA and SAIFULLAH PARACHA
Not Classified By Court:
Hon. LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, Hon. ANTHONY J. BLINKEN and Adm. EDWARD B. CASHMAN
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN
Respondent:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, ANTHONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
