Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mughal v. US Department of State et al
as 3:2023cv02267
Plaintiff:
Dr Kahkashan Mughal and Kahkashan Mughal
Defendant:
US Department of State, US Department of Homeland Security, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00135
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mejia v. Blinken
as 4:2023cv02675
Plaintiff:
Luis Javier Mejia
Defendant:
Secretary of State Anthony J. Blinken, Anthony J. Blinken and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02284
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Barcenas v. Blinken et al
as 4:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
SARAI BARCENAS
Defendant:
Anthony J. Blinken and Rina Bitter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rios v. Blinken
as 7:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Bernice Neave Rios
Defendant:
Anthony J. Blinken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Leal v. Blinken et al
as 7:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Marcela Guadalupe Leal
Defendant:
Anthony J. Blinken and United States Department of State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
