Cases 41 - 50 of 53
J.T. Colby & Company, Inc. et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2011cv04060
Plaintiff:
J.T. Colby & Company, Inc. , J.Boyston & Company , Publishers LLC and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Apple Inc. v. Lam et al
as 1:2011cv02507
Plaintiff:
Apple Inc.
Defendant:
Dunwah Lam, Fei Lik Lam, Yuk Lam and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Apple Inc. et al v. Dollisme
as 3:2011cv00168
Plaintiff:
Apple Inc. , Adobe Systems Incorporated , Autodesk, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Edy Jean Dollisme
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2010cv08655
Plaintiff:
Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Nintendo Co., Ltd., Nintendo of America Inc., SONY Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Battino v. Samba Studios, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv07862
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Battino
Defendant:
Samba Studios, LLC, Mario Bosch, Apple Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Emblaze Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2010cv05713
Plaintiff:
Emblaze Ltd.
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Alexander v. Murdoch et al
as 1:2010cv05613
Plaintiff:
Martin Alexander
Defendant:
Keith Rupert Murdoch , News Corporation, Inc. , Disney Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Eastman Kodak Company v. Apple Inc.
as 6:2010cv06021
Plaintiff:
Eastman Kodak Company, Eastman Kodak Company and Eastman Kodak Company
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Eastman Kodak Company v. Apple Inc.
as 6:2010cv06022
Plaintiff:
Eastman Kodak Company, Eastman Kodak Company and Eastman Kodak Company
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Psihoyos v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv07960
Plaintiff:
Louis P. Psihoyos
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Apple Computers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
