Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Epperson v. AHS Management Company, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Michael Epperson
Defendant:
AHS Management Company, Inc. doing business as Ardent Health Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Redd v. AHS Medical Holdings LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01342
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Redd
Defendant:
AHS Medical Holdings LLC doing business as Ardent Health Services and Ardent Medical Services, Inc. doing business as Ardent Health Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Burke v. AHS Medical Holdings LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
Billie Burke
Defendant:
AHS Medical Holdings LLC doing business as Ardent Health Services, Ardent Medical Services, Inc. doing business as Ardent Health Services and AHS Management Company, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Redd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stonehouse et al v. Ardent Health Services Welfare Benefit Fund et al
as 1:2009cv00206
Plaintiff:
Kristine Stonehouse, Kristine Stonehouse, Michael Hart and others
Defendant:
Ardent Health Services Welfare Benefit Fund and AHS Management Company, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Ardent Health Services Welfare Benefit Fund and AHS Management Company, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Kristine Stonehouse and Michael Hart
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Stonehouse et al v. Ardent Health Services Welfare Benefit Fund et al
as 3:2008cv00981
Plaintiff:
Kristine Stonehouse, Kristine Stonehouse, Michael Hart and others
Defendant:
Ardent Health Services Welfare Benefit Fund and AHS Management Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ontiveros v. Bailey Medical Center, LLC et al
as 4:2008cv00358
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Ontiveros, Jr and Alfredo Ontiveros, Jr
Defendant:
Bailey Medical Center, LLC, Bailey Medical Center, LLC, Bailey Medical Center, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
