Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Warren Petersen, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1132
Petitioner:
Warren Petersen, President of the Arizona State Senate, Ben Toma, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and Arizona Trucking Association
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Warren Petersen, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1133
Petitioner:
Warren Petersen, President of the Arizona State Senate, Ben Toma, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and Arizona Trucking Association
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Warren Petersen, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1073
Petitioner:
Warren Petersen, President of the Arizona State Senate, Ben Toma, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Charles Caston v. Switzerland Government, et al
as 10-5046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Caston
Defendant - Appellee:
Switzerland Government, United States Department of Justice, Hearst Corporation and others
Moms Agnst Mercury, et al v. FDA, et al
as 06-1147
Petitioner:
Moms Against Mercury, Connecticut Coalition for Environmental Justice, Oregonians For Life and others
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration
LaRouche, Lyndon H., et al v. Fowler, Donald L., et al
as 96-7191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., Alex D. Promise, Charles M. Shaw and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald L. Fowler, Individually and as Chairman Democratic National Committee, Democratic National Committee, James L. Brady, as Chairman Louisiana Democartic Party and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
