Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Mowat Construction Company, Inc. v. AG Hydro, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv01568
Defendant:
AG Hydro, LLC, United States Army Corps of Engineers and United States Forest Service
Plaintiff:
Mowat Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Mowat Construction Company, Inc. v. AG Hydro, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01568
Defendant:
AG Hydro, LLC, United States Army Corps of Engineers and United States Forest Service
Plaintiff:
Mowat Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Columbia Riverkeeper v. Bostick et al
as 3:2013cv01494
Defendant:
Lieutenant General Thomas P. Bostick and U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers
Plaintiff:
Columbia Riverkeeper
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Columbia Riverkeeper v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2013cv01310
Defendant:
Thomas P. Bostick and United States Army Corps of Engineers
Plaintiff:
Columbia Riverkeeper
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
National Wildlife Federation et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 3:2001cv00640
Plaintiff:
American Rivers, Inc., Columbia Riverkeeper, Federation of Fly Fishers and others
Unknown:
Aaron C. Courtney, Aaron C. Courtney, Aaron C. Courtney and others
Intervenor Defendant:
BPA Customer Group, Franklin County Farm Bureau Federation, Grant County Farm Bureau Federation and others
Amicu:
Center for Tribal Water Advocacy, Columbia-Snake River Irrigators Association, Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation and others
503) 222-2301 (fax:
Clarkston Golf & Country Club
406) 675-4665 (fax:
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes and Joseph P. Hovenkotter
509) 634-2387 (fax:
Stephen H. Suagee
206) 448-0962 (fax:
John B Arum
541) 737-3590 (fax:
Dr. Howard F. Horton, Ph.D.
410) 230-1389 (fax:
Timothy M. Sullivan
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, State of Washington, U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers and others
208) 667-4695 (fax:
Shannon D. Work
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of Oregon
206) 623-4986 (fax:
Matthew A. Love and Matthew A. Love
360) 586-3454 (fax:
Sheila D. Lynch and Sheila D. Lynch
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Dulcich, Inc. et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2011cv00643
Plaintiff:
Dulcich, Inc. and Pacific Aquaculture, Inc.
415) 293-8001 (fax:
Thomas D Roth and Thomas D Roth
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers and United States Bureau of Reclamation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Audubon Society of Portland et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) et al
as 3:2011cv00494
Plaintiff:
Audubon Society of Portland and Willamette Riverkeeper
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers
Intervenor:
Port of Portland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531 Endangered Species Act
Olenec et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 6:2010cv06427
Plaintiff:
Bandon Woodlands Community Association, John B Jones, III, Julie Jones and others
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Barry A Thom, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Oregon Resources Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2010cv01129
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service and United States Army Corps of Engineers
Plaintiff:
Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531 Endangered Species Act
Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 3:2008cv00939
Plaintiff:
Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
