Cases 21 - 30 of 101
Duenas v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2010cv05884
Plaintiff:
Christopher P. Duenas
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger , Edmund G. Brown, Jr. , Kamala D. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Duenas et al
as 2:2010at01881
Defendant:
Christopher P. Duenas, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duenas v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2010at01882
Plaintiff:
Christopher P. Duenas
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and Joseph Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2010at01880
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and Joseph Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theodore O'Dell Wilson v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2008cv05268
Respondent:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Does, G. D. Gross and others
Petitioner:
Theodore O'Dell Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly McGuire v. The Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 8:2010cv01799
Defendant:
James L Anderson, Troy L Butzlaff, B Bybee and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly McGuire
Robert Gibson v. U.S. DC Sacramento
as 10-72807
:
In re: ROBERT D. GIBSON
Petitioner:
ROBERT D. GIBSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, J. CLARK KELSO, TRACE O'MAIORINO and others
Young v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 4:2010cv03594
Plaintiff:
H. Nicole Young
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and George Gascon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Obama et al
as 3:2010cv02913
Plaintiff:
Derrick Norbert Morris
Defendant:
Hussein Barrack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, US Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mark Collins v. Arnold Schwarzenegger
as 10-71704
Petitioner:
MARK COLLINS
Respondent:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
