Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv60114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Tangshan Ganglu Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. v. Becker & Poliakoff, P.A. et al
as 0:2016cv61031
Plaintiff:
Tangshan Ganglu Iron & Steel Company, Ltd.
Defendant:
Becker & Poliakoff, P.A. and Pamela Anselmo
Claimant:
Arnstein & Lehr LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnstein & Lehr LLP v. Epic Aviation, LLC
as 8:2016cv00291
Plaintiff:
Arnstein & Lehr LLP
Defendant:
Epic Aviation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnstein & Lehr LLP v. Etkin & Company, Incorporated
as 0:2015cv62703
Plaintiff:
Arnstein & Lehr LLP
Defendant:
Etkin & Company, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kniskern et al v. Durkin & Durkin, LLP et al
as 0:2015cv60573
Plaintiff:
Douglas Kniskern and Arnstein & Lehr LLP
Defendant:
Durkin & Durkin, LLP, Elizabeth Mary Durkin and Elizabeth M. Durkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keeton v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv20442
Plaintiff:
Lana C. Keeton
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. , Gynecare Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015bk00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv60134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv62935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
EMI Sun Village, Inc. et al v. Catledge et al
as 1:2013cv21594
Plaintiff:
EMI Sun Village, Inc. , Sun Village Juan Dolio, Inc , EMI Resorts (S.V.G.), Inc. and others
Defendant:
James B. Catledge, Impact, Inc., Michael Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
