Cases 1 - 6 of 6
ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv01328
Plaintiff:
ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER, ADVOCATE ILLINOIS MASONIC MEDICAL CENTER, ADVOCATE LUTHERAN GENERAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ascension Borgess Hospital, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 21-5246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ascension Borgess Hospital, Ascension Sacred Heart Hospital Pensacola, Ascension SE Wisconsin Hospital-St. Joseph Campus and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Rush Copley Memorial Hospital, 20-cv-01957, Rush Oak Park Hospital, Inc., 20-cv-01957 and Rush University Medical Center, 20-cv-01957
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv01651
Plaintiff:
ADVOCATE LUTHERAN GENERAL HOSPITAL, AVERA MCKENNAN HOSPITAL & UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTER, AURORA SHEBOYGAN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
Secretary XAVIER BECERRA and XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
AMITA HEALTH MERCY MEDICAL CENTER AURORA et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv01400
Plaintiff:
D.W. MCMILLAN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ASCENSION BORGESS HOSPITAL et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv00139
Plaintiff:
INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS, IU HEALTH NORTH HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ADVOCATE BROMENN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. ALEX M. AZAR II
as 1:2019cv03751
Plaintiff:
ADVOCATE LUTHERAN GENERAL HOSPITAL, AVERA MCKENNAN HOSPITAL & UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTER, AURORA SHEBOYGAN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
