Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Brekhus v. ASUS Computer International et al
as 3:2019cv02304
Plaintiff:
Edward Brekhus
Defendant:
ASUS Computer International and ASUSTeK Computer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carlotti v. ASUS Computer International et al
as 4:2018cv03369
Plaintiff:
Joseph Carlotti
Defendant:
ASUS Computer International and ASUSTeK Computer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Asustek Computer, Inc. v. Shanghai Easter Fudart Transport Service Co. LTD et al
as 2:2010cv00846
Plaintiff:
Asustek Computer, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
China Cargo Airlines, Dart Express (Taiwan) LTD, China Eastern Airlines Co. LTD, M&M Transport and others
Defendant:
China Cargo Airlines, Dart Express (Taiwan) LTD, China Eastern Airlines Co. LTD, M&M Transport and others
Cross Claimant:
Truxton Logistics Corp
Asustek Computer, Inc. v. Shanghai Eastern Fudart Transport Services, Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2009cv02570
Plaintiff:
Asustek Computer, Inc. and Asustek Computer, Inc.
Defendant:
Dart Express (Taiwan) Ltd., Ultra Air Cargo, Inc., Truxton Logistics Corp. and others
Cross Defendant:
Dart Express (Taiwan) Ltd., Ultra Air Cargo, Inc., Truxton Logistics Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11503 Railroad Revitalization Regulatory Reform Act
Asustek Computer, Inc. v. Shanghai Easter Fudart Transport Service Co. LTD et al
as 1:2008cv02768
Plaintiff:
Asustek Computer, Inc. and Asustek Computer, Inc.
Defendant:
Shanghai Easter Fudart Transport Service Co. LTD, China Eastern Airlines Co. LTD, China Cargo Airlines, Dart Express (Taiwan) LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Asustek Computer, Inc. v. Shanghai Eastern Fudart Transport Services Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2008cv02770
Plaintiff:
Asustek Computer, Inc. and Asustek Computer, Inc.
Defendant:
Shanghai Eastern Fudart Transport Services Co., Ltd., China Eastern Airlines Co., Ltd., China Cargo Airlines and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11503 Railroad Revitalization Regulatory Reform
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
