Cases 1 - 7 of 7
TSOSIE v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv60057
Plaintiff:
LEO TSOSIE
Defendant:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY , ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANGEN v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv60055
Plaintiff:
ROGER HANGEN
Defendant:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY , ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWNLOW v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv67117
Plaintiff:
BERTIE A. BROWNLOW, JR.
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cross_claimant:
ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
Cross_defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HETZEL v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2009cv66973
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND PETER HETZEL, RAYMOND PETER HETZEL and RAYMOND PETER HETZEL
Defendant:
ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY and ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GARCIA v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2009cv66971
Plaintiff:
RAMON GARCIA, RAMON GARCIA and RAMON GARCIA
Defendant:
ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY and ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SIERRA v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2009cv66966
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIERRA
Defendant:
ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY and ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCDOUGALL v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2009cv66974
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P MCDOUGALL, THOMAS P MCDOUGALL and THOMAS P MCDOUGALL
Defendant:
ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY and ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
