Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Mental Hygiene Legal Services v. Cuomo
as 14-1421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mental Hygiene Legal Services
Defendant:
Atoosa P. Mamdani, Shawn Short, David Paterson and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Andrew Cuomo, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Eric T. Schneiderman, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, Ann Marie Sullivan, in her official capacity as Acting Commissioner of the New York State of Mental Health and others
Mental Hygiene Legal Services v. Paterson
as 11-1539
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Mental Hygiene Legal Services
Defendant:
Eliot Spitzer, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Diana Jones Ritter, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Mahmoud A. Mamdani and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Eric T. Schneiderman, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, Andrew Cuomo, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Michael Hogan, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Health and others
Micalden Investments S.A. v. Rostropovich et al
as 1:2007cv02395
Plaintiff:
Micalden Investments S.A.
Defendant:
Olga Rostropovich , Cooley Godward Kronish L.L.P. , Renee Schwartz and others
Cross_claimant:
Atoosa P. Mamdani , Mahmoud A. Mamdani and Olga Rostropovich
Cross_defendant:
Olga Rostropovich , Cooley Godward Kronish L.L.P. and Renee Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Micalden Investments S.A. v. Rostropovich et al
as 1:2007cv02395
Plaintiff:
Micalden Investments S.A., Micalden Investments S.A. and Micalden Investments S.A.
Defendant:
Olga Rostropovich, Cooley Godward Kronish L.L.P., Cooley Godward Kronish L.L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
