Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Atrium 5 Limited v. Samuel Roach
as 3:2023cv01045
Plaintiff:
Atrium 5 Limited
Defendant:
Samuel Roach a sole proprietor doing business as First Coast Stuco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Atrium 5 Limited v. RYO Cigarettes of Jupiter, LLC et al
as 9:2017cv81085
Plaintiff:
Atrium 5 Limited
Defendant:
RYO Cigarettes of Jupiter, LLC. and Donovin LaFollette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atrium 5 Limited v. Begum et al
as 6:2017cv01607
Plaintiff:
Atrium 5 Limited
Defendant:
Nurjahan Begum, Reedh Food Mart, Inc., Mary Dee Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cole v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 9:2017cv80859
Plaintiff:
James Cole
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Maquet Cardiovascular, LLC and Getinge AB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Godwin v. Atrium Medical Corporation
as 6:2017cv00361
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Godwin
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dowling v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 6:2017cv00248
Plaintiff:
Mary Elizabeth Dowling
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon Inc. and Atrium Medical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cole v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 9:2016cv81927
Plaintiff:
James Keith Cole
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Maquet Cardiovascular, LLC and Getinge AB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atrium 5 Limited v. Hossain et al
as 6:2016cv01964
Plaintiff:
Atrium 5 Limited
Defendant:
Mohammad Hossain, Reedh Food Mart, Inc., Terrell Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATRIUM 5 LIMITED v. ALI CHAD CORP et al
as 1:2016cv23217
Plaintiff:
ATRIUM 5 LIMITED
Defendant:
ALI CHAD CORP, H & H INVESTMENT & REAL ESTATE, INC. and ROBERT NUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
