Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Yungman v. Garland et al
as 0:2024cv62050
Petitioner:
Kevin Yungman
Respondent:
Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary Antony J. Blinken and US Marshal Gadyaces S. Serralta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Yungman v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv24265
Respondent:
Karen Archibald, US Marshal Gadyaces S. Serralta, Secretary Antony J. Blinken and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Yungman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv81201
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61724
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv23575
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv81104
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv23303
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Action to compel U.S. officer to perform duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv23304
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Action to compel U.S. officer to perform duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv23232
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61571
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
