Cases 51 - 60 of 483
Coffey v. Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois et al
as 3:2018cv50256
Petitioner:
John Coffey
Respondent:
Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Durant v. Lashbrook et al
as 1:2018cv04716
Petitioner:
Kenneth Durant
Respondent:
Jacqueline Lashbrook
Defendant:
Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Salazar v. Roberson et al
as 1:2018cv04227
Petitioner:
Ruben Salazar
Respondent:
Kess Roberson and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cano v. Hendricks et al
as 3:2018cv50079
Plaintiff:
Taylor James Cano
Defendant:
Troy Hendricks and Attorney General for the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Birch v. Director Scott et al
as 3:2018cv50072
Plaintiff:
John Birch
Defendant:
Director Scott and Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chapman v. Lashbrook et al
as 1:2017cv09190
Petitioner:
Robert James Chapman
Respondent:
Jacqueline Lashbrook and Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barksdale v. Scott et al
as 1:2017cv08668
Petitioner:
Paul Barksdale
Respondent:
Roger Scott and Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reese v. Lashbrook et al
as 1:2017cv08443
Petitioner:
Kiearre Reese
Respondent:
Jaqueline Lashbrook and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Podkulski v. Director IDOC et al
as 1:2017cv07960
Petitioner:
Steven John Podkulski
Respondent:
Director IDOC, Warden of CCDOC and Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. Owen S et al
as 1:2017cv06339
Petitioner:
Armando Martinez
Respondent:
Owen S and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
