Cases 61 - 70 of 530
Jones v. Romero, et al
as 20-1291
Respondent / Appellee:
MIKE ROMERO, DEAN WILLIAMS and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WAYNE JONES
In re: Vreeland, et al
as 20-1200
Petitioner:
In re: DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and DAVID ZUPAN
Aragon v. Williams, et al
as 20-1188
Respondent / Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and DEAN WILLIAMS, Executive Director, C.D.O.C.
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUBEN ARAGON
Wise v. Hansen, et al
as 20-1172
Respondent / Appellee:
MATHEW HANSEN and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Petitioner / Appellant:
MIGEL C. WISE
Moore v. Williams, et al
as 20-1171
Respondent / Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and DEAN WILLIAMS
Petitioner / Appellant:
LESSELL H. MOORE
Nicholls v. Hansen, et al
as 20-1159
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY P. NICHOLLS
Respondent / Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and MATTHEW HANSEN, Warden
Smith v. Lengerich, et al
as 20-1129
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD LEE SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and JASON LENGERICH, Warden
Wingfield v. Jaques, et al
as 20-1120
Respondent / Appellee:
TERRY JAQUES, Warden, A.V.C.F. and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSHUA E. WINGFIELD
Lebere v. Trani, et al
as 20-1117
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENT ERIC LEBERE
Respondent / Appellee:
COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and TRAVIS TRANI, Warden
Lopez v. Edelen, et al
as 20-1116
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EDELEN, Warden of the Taylor Correctional Institution and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAMON LOPEZ, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
