Cases 51 - 60 of 88
Straub v. Goodrich, et al
as 19-1319
Respondent / Appellee:
COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and BARRY GOODRICH, BCCF Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN C. STRAUB
Whitten v. Williams, et al
as 19-1289
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES WHITTEN
Respondent / Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and DEAN WILLIAMS
Carbajal v. Williams, et al
as 19-1249
Respondent / Appellee:
DEAN WILLIAMS, Executive Director of CDOC and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEAN CARBAJAL
Vreeland v. Zupan, et al
as 19-1244
Respondent / Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and DAVID ZUPAN
Petitioner / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Hardin v. Jaques, et al
as 19-1201
Respondent / Appellee:
PHILIP J. WEISER, Attorney General of the State of Colorado and TERRY JAQUES, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM DANIEL HARDIN
Quintana v. Trani, et al
as 19-1195
Respondent / Appellee:
TRAVIS TRANI and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANGEL QUINTANA
Wells v. Falk, et al
as 19-1185
Respondent / Appellee:
PHIL WEISER, Attorney General of the State of Colorado and JAMES FALK
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID CHARLES WELLS
Demos v. State of Washington, et al
as 19-1139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF WASHINGTON, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and others
Quezada v. Raemisch, et al
as 19-1136
Respondent / Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Petitioner / Appellant:
JESUS LOYA QUEZADA
In re: Morales, et al
as 19-1076
Respondent:
CHAP DELAINE, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Petitioner:
DANIEL G. MORALES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
