Cases 51 - 60 of 2,199
Elam v. Warden Bean et al
as 2:2023cv02137
Petitioner:
Calvin Thomas Elam
Respondent:
Warden Bean and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Hardy et al
as 3:2023cv00660
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Rodriguez
Respondent:
David A. Hardy and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hudspath v. Garrett, et al.
as 23-4207
Petitioner / Appellant:
MELVIN M. HUDSPATH
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM GARRETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Colon v. Baker, et al.
as 23-4069
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARC ANTHONY COLON
Respondent / Appellee:
R. BAKER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Washington v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv02002
Petitioner:
Juh'Juan Washington
Respondent:
Calvin Johnson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lampkin
as 2:2023cv01997
Petitioner:
Devin Lampkin
Respondent:
High Desert State Prison and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonham v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 23-3802
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRYAN P. BONHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
VanHorn v. Williams, et al.
as 23-3647
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD L. VANHORN
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR. and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Vandecar v. Reubart, et al.
as 23-3622
Petitioner:
ROSEMARY VANDECAR
Respondent:
WILLIAM REUBART, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al.
as 23-3569
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
DREESEN, LINDSEY, SHIFT COMMAND and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.