Cases 131 - 140 of 1,882
Mariano Madrid v. William Hutchings, et al
as 22-16639
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIANO MADRID
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM HUTCHINGS
Robert Smith v. Attorney General for the State of Nevada, et al
as 22-16637
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and CALVIN JOHNSON
Harold Cordova v. Fernandies Frazier, et al
as 22-16627
Petitioner / Appellant:
HAROLD CORDOVA
Respondent / Appellee:
FERNANDIES FRAZIER and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Barao v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv01776
Petitioner:
Randy Barao
Respondent:
State of Nevada and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01757
Petitioner:
Christopher Stewart
Respondent:
Calvin Johnson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steven Voss v. Kyle Olsen, et al
as 22-16557
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN FLOYD VOSS
Respondent / Appellee:
KYLE OLSEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Horst v. Warden Dreesen
as 2:2022cv01679
Petitioner:
Tara Lynne Horst
Respondent:
Warden Dreesen and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephen Choate v. Williams, et al
as 22-16494
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN LEE CHOATE
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Lamartice Wright v. Kyle Olsen, et al
as 22-16456
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAMARTICE WRIGHT
Respondent / Appellee:
KYLE OLSEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Richard Banda v. Calvin Johnson, et al
as 22-16454
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD BANDA
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
