Cases 51 - 60 of 500
Steven Voss v. Kyle Olsen, et al
as 22-16557
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN FLOYD VOSS
Respondent / Appellee:
KYLE OLSEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sean Orth v. Warden, et al
as 22-16452
Petitioner / Appellant:
SEAN RODNEY ORTH
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, High Desert State Prison, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and CALVIN JOHNSON
Richard Banda v. Calvin Johnson, et al
as 22-16454
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD BANDA
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Lamartice Wright v. Kyle Olsen, et al
as 22-16456
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAMARTICE WRIGHT
Respondent / Appellee:
KYLE OLSEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Stanley Rimer v. Renee Baker, et al
as 22-16270
Petitioner / Appellant:
STANLEY RIMER
Respondent / Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, Warden, BRIAN SANDOVAL, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Nicholas Crystal v. Calvin Johnson, et al
as 22-16294
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS CRYSTAL
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Matthew Houston v. Calvin Johnson, et al
as 22-16322
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Steven Kinford v. Brian Williams, et al
as 22-16323
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN KINFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, HAROLD WICKHAM and others
Justin Edmisten v. William Gittere, et al
as 22-16139
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUSTIN EDMISTEN and JUSTIN EDMISTON
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM L. GITTERE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nicholas Navarrette v. Attorney General for the State of Nevada, et al
as 22-16198
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS A. NAVARRETTE
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, CALVIN JOHNSON and STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
