Cases 61 - 70 of 500
Bryan Bonham v. Calvin Johnson, et al
as 22-16317
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRYAN P. BONHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Brandon Jefferson v. Attorney General for the State of Nevada, et al
as 22-16210
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRANDON M. JEFFERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and TIM GARRETT, Substitute in for Russell
Respondent:
PERRY RUSSELL
Roberto Durand v. William Ruebart, et al
as 22-16181
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM RUEBART and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Bryan Bonham v. Calvin Johnson, et al
as 22-16156
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRYAN P. BONHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Brian O'Keefe v. Doug Gillespie, et al
as 22-16230
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN KERRY O'KEEFE
Respondent / Appellee:
DOUG GILLESPIE, Sheriff and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Edward Garza v. William Hutchings, et al
as 22-16082
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD GARZA
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM HUTCHINGS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jorge Miranda-Rivas v. William Gittere, et al
as 22-15882
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE MIRANDA-RIVAS
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Respondent:
HAROLD WICKHAM
Charles McDonald v. William Hutchings, et al
as 22-15952
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES E. MCDONALD
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM HUTCHINGS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Evan Moore v. William Hutchings, et al
as 22-16076
Petitioner / Appellant:
EVAN EUGENE MOORE
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM HUTCHINGS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
James Sharkey v. Brian Williams, et al
as 22-16071
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES THEODORE SHARKEY
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
