Cases 61 - 70 of 2,201
VanHorn v. Williams, et al.
as 23-3647
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD L. VANHORN
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR. and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Vandecar v. Reubart, et al.
as 23-3622
Petitioner:
ROSEMARY VANDECAR
Respondent:
WILLIAM REUBART, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al.
as 23-3569
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
DREESEN, LINDSEY, SHIFT COMMAND and others
Caninico v. Nevada Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv01546
Plaintiff:
Steven Canonico
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston v. Bean, et al.
as 23-3482
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Respondent / Appellee:
JEREMY BEAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Bai v. Williams, et al.
as 23-2216
Petitioner / Appellant:
XIAO YE BAI
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR. and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Davis v. Warden Willian Gittere
as 2:2023cv01732
Petitioner:
Davis A Terrance and Terrance Davis
Respondent:
Warden Willian Gittere and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edmiston v. Gittere, et al.
as 23-2220
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUSTIN EDMISTON
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM L. GITTERE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Skinner v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Reno
as 23-3289
Petitioner:
RODERICK SKINNER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
Not Classified By Court:
PERRY RUSSELL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Wilcox v. Garrett, et al.
as 23-2897
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS FRANK WILCOX
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM GARRETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
