Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Agility Auto Parts Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Agility Auto Parts Inc.
Defendant:
United States, United States Trade Representative and United States Customs and Border Protection
New World International, Inc. v. Ford Global Technologies, LLC
as 19-1411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL AUTO PARTS, INC. and NEW WORLD INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and FORD MOTOR COMPANY
ARMAMENT SYSTEMS V IQ HONG KONG
as 08-1291
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Armament Systems & Procedures, Inc.
Defendant:
Bandwagon Incorporated, Carquest Management Services, Inc., Emissive Energy Corp. and others
Carquest Management Services, Inc:
Emissive Energy Corp:
Defendant-Appellee:
Team Products International, Inc.
ARMAMENT SYSTEMS V IQ HONG KONG
as 08-1104
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Armament Systems & Procedures, Inc.
Defendant-Appellee:
Bandwagon Incorporated, C Crane Company, Inc., Carquest Management Services, Inc. and others
KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE V ITC
as 07-1526
Appellant:
Depo Auto Parts Ind. Co., Ltd., Gordon Auto Body Parts Co., Ltd., Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. and others
Appellee:
International Trade Commission
FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES V ITC
as 07-1357
Amicus Curiae:
American Insurance Association, Automotive Aftermarket Industry Association, Center for Auto Safety and others
Intervenor:
Depo Auto Parts Ind. Co., Ltd., Gordon Auto Body Parts Co., Ltd., Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. and others
Depo Auto Parts Ind. Co., Ltd:
Appellant:
Ford Global Technologies, LLC
Appellee:
United States International Trade Commission
EGYPTIAN GODDESS V SWISA INC
as 06-1562
Amicus Curiae:
American Intellectual Property Law Association, Apple Inc., Auto Body Parts Association and others
Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee:
Dror Swisa and Swisa, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Egyptian Goddess, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
