Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Austin v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 3:2013cv04775
Plaintiff:
Sheila Austin
Defendant:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , Sanofi US Services Inc. , AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PIECZENIK v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 3:2010cv02296
Plaintiff:
GEORGE PIECZENIK
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP, NOVO NORDISK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al v. SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. et al
as 2:2009cv05179
Plaintiff:
AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC., AVENTIS INC. and CARDERM CAPITAL L.P.
Defendant:
SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES INC. and SUN PHARMA GLOBAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al v. SUN PHARMA GLOBAL INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00325
Plaintiff:
AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC., AVENTIS INC. and CARDERM CAPITAL L.P.
Defendant:
SUN PHARMA GLOBAL INC., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES INC. and SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al v. WOCKHARDT LIMITED et al
as 2:2007cv05647
Plaintiff:
AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC., AVENTIS, INC. and CARDERM CAPITAL L.P.
Defendant:
WOCKHARDT LIMITED and WOCKHARDT USA INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. et al
as 2:2007cv05180
Plaintiff:
AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC., AVENTIS, INC. and CARDERM CAPITAL L.P.
Defendant:
DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al v. SANDOZ INC.
as 2:2007cv02454
Plaintiff:
AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC., AVENTIS INC. and CARDERM CAPITAL L.P.
Defendant:
SANDOZ INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
