Cases 71 - 80 of 278
Hill-Hinton v. Bank of America NA et al
as 1:2012cv02461
Plaintiff:
Wanda Hill-Hinton
Defendant:
Bank of America NA , Pendergast & Associates PC , BAC Home Loans Servicing LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Ambarus v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv02126
Plaintiff:
Adrian Ambarus
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation , McCalla Raymer, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Harris v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
as 1:2012cv02049
Plaintiff:
Michaele Harris
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Claypoole v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv02005
Plaintiff:
Amy C. Claypoole
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Koretsky v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
as 1:2012cv01927
Plaintiff:
Madeline Koretsky
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Basey v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 1:2012cv01897
Plaintiff:
Paris Basey
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, MERS, Inc. , Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Evans v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
as 1:2012cv01849
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Evans
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Robbins v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 1:2012cv01828
Plaintiff:
Pearl Robbins
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Woodson v. BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP
as 4:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Hall Woodson
Defendant:
BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. McCalla Raymer, LLC. et al
as 1:2012cv01714
Plaintiff:
Marcia Moore
Defendant:
McCalla Raymer, LLC. , Charles Troy Crouse , Thomas Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
