Cases 21 - 30 of 245
Lamborn v. Bank Of Nova Scotia et al
as ILN/1:20-CV-05268
Defendant:
Bank Of Nova Scotia, John Does 1-25, Scotia Capital (USA) Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lamborn and Arthur H Lamborn, Jr.
Blankenship v. The Bank of Nova Scotia et al
as ILN/1:20-CV-05267
Plaintiff:
Blankenship and Larry Blankenship
Defendant:
The Bank of Nova Scotia, Scotia Capital (USA) Inc., Jane/John Does 1-50 and others
Port 22, LLC v. The Bank of Nova Scotia et al
as ILN/1:20-CV-05270
Plaintiff:
Port 22, LLC
Defendant:
The Bank of Nova Scotia, Scotia Capital (USA) Inc., Jane/John Does 1-50 and others
Serri v. Bank of Nova Scotia et al
as NYE/1:20-CV-04163
Defendant:
Bank of Nova Scotia, John Does 1-25, Scotia Capital (USA) Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Serri and Mark Serri
TRAN v. THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA et al
as 3:2020cv12261
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-25, COREY FLAUM and THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
Plaintiff:
DON TRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TRAN v. THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA et al
as NJ/3:20-CV-12261
Plaintiff:
TRAN and DON TRAN
Defendant:
THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, JOHN DOES 1-25 and COREY FLAUM
JEFF BRAUN OF ML OPTIONS TRADING, LLC v. THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA et al
as NJ/3:20-CV-12217
Plaintiff:
JEFF BRAUN OF ML OPTIONS TRADING, LLC
Defendant:
THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, COREY FLAUM and DOES 1-25
JEFF BRAUN OF ML OPTIONS TRADING, LLC v. THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA et al
as 3:2020cv12217
Defendant:
COREY FLAUM, DOES 1-25 and THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
Plaintiff:
JEFF BRAUN OF ML OPTIONS TRADING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TOMASULO et al v. THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA et al
as 3:2020cv12111
Defendant:
COREY FLAUM and THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY TOMASULO and CHRISTOPHER DEPAOLI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TOMASULO et al v. THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA et al
as NJ/3:20-CV-12111
Plaintiff:
TOMASULO, JEFFERY TOMASULO and CHRISTOPHER DEPAOLI
Defendant:
THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA and COREY FLAUM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
