Cases 51 - 60 of 85
MARCUSSE v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv00806
Plaintiff:
JANET MARCUSSE
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, ERIC HOLDER, TIMOTHY GEITHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAZEWELL v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv00793
Plaintiff:
ANTWINE TAZEWELL
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, GEORGE BUSH, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALPINE v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv00778
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALPINE
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, WILLIAM SUTER and STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMIDULLAH et al v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv00758
Petitioner:
HAMIDULLAH and WAKEEL KHAN
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, ROBERT M. GATES, JACK L. BRIGGS, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DEYERBERG v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2010cv00671
Plaintiff:
JANET MARIE DEYERBERG
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, BARACK OBAMA, JOHN KERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ALPINE et al
as 1:2010cv00565
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALPINE
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA and WILLIAM K. SUTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. OBAMA
as 1:2010mc00240
Plaintiff:
LACY L. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
KHAN et al v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv00535
Petitioner:
JAN SHER KHAN and SHAH NAWAZ KHAN
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, ROBERT GATES and JOHN DOES NOS. 1 THROUGH 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AMANATULLAH et al v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv00536
Petitioner:
AMANATULLAH and ABDUL RAZAQ
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, ROBERT M. GATES and JOHN AND/OR JANE DOES NOS. 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HAMBALI v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv00407
Petitioner:
RIDUAN BIN ISOMUDDIN HAMBALI
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, ROBERT GATES, STEVEN BLAISDELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
