Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 30
South Bay United Pentecostal, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-55533
Plaintiff / Appellant: BISHOP ARTHUR HODGES III, an individual and SOUTH BAY UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, a California nonprofit corporation
Defendant / Appellee: GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as the Governor of California, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California, HELEN ROBBINS-MEYER, in her official capacity as Director of Emergency Services and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE and BEND THE ARC: A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS; DISCIPLES JUSTICE ACTION NETWORK; INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION; MEN OF REFORM JUDAISM; METHODIST FEDERATION FOR SOCIAL ACTION; NATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE CHURCHES O
Beverly Sevcik, et al v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 12-17668
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF ALABAMA; STATE OF ALASKA; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF IDAHO; STATE OF MONTANA; STATE OF NEBRASKA; STATE OF OKLAHOMA; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; and STATE OF UTAH, COLAGE, HAWAII PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CAREN CAFFERATA-JENKINS, GREG FLAMER, SARA GEIGER and others
Defendant / Appellee: BRIAN E. SANDOVAL, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Nevada, AMY HARVEY, in her official capacity as the County Clerk and Commissioner of Civil Marriages for Washoe County, Nevada, DIANA ALBA, in her official capacity as the County Clerk and Commissioner of Civil Marriages for Clark County, Nevada and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: COALITION FOR THE PROTECTION OF MARRIAGE
USA v. Raymond Miller
as 13-3206
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: RAYMOND MILLER
Amicus Curiae: THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS and others
USA v. Levi Miller
as 13-3196
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: LEVI F. MILLER
Amicus Curiae: THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS and others
USA v. Elizabeth Miller
as 13-3193
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ELIZABETH MILLER
Amicus Curiae: THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS and others
USA v. Daniel Mullet
as 13-3195
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL S. MULLET
Amicus Curiae: THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS and others
USA v. Freeman Burkholder
as 13-3214
Amicus Curiae: PFLAG INTERNATIONAL, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: FREEMAN BURKHOLDER
USA v. Emanuel Schrock
as 13-3208
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: EMANUEL SCHROCK
Amicus Curiae: THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS and others
USA v. Lester Miller
as 13-3204
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: LESTER M. MILLER
Amicus Curiae: THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS and others
USA v. Linda Schrock
as 13-3194
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: LINDA SCHROCK
Amicus Curiae: THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?