Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ballard v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.
as 2:2014cv02058
Plaintiff:
Paige Ballard
Defendant:
Best Buy Stores, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Green v. Hafen et al
as 2:2014cv01190
Defendant:
T. Best, J. Campbell, Conrad Hafen and others
Plaintiff:
Malique Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Best Odds Corp v. iBus Media Limited et al
as 2:2014cv00932
Plaintiff:
Best Odds Corp
Defendant:
iBus Media Holdings (IOM) Limited and iBus Media Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Best Odds Corp v. iBus Media Limited et al
as 2:2013cv02008
Plaintiff:
Best Odds Corp
Defendant:
iBus Media Holdings (IOM) Limited and iBus Media Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
Whitlock v. Nevada Capital Insurance Company et al
as 2:2013cv01015
Defendant:
American Best Agency, Inc., Nevada Capital Insurance Company and Rick Saxen
Plaintiff:
Breanna Whitlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
