Cases filed in New York
Cases 61 - 70 of 219
Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04566
Plaintiff: Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04563
Plaintiff: The City of Philadelphia
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Royal Bank of Scotland PLC and others
Interested Party: The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Harrison County, Mississippi et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04561
Plaintiff: Harrison County, Mississippi , Magnolia Regional Health Center and Cullman Regional Medical Center, Inc.
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
LD Construction LLC et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04239
Plaintiff: LD Construction LLC , LDLJ Associates, L.P. , Lawrence W. Gardner and others
Defendant: Bank Of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016md02704
Defendant: Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: Genesee County Employees' Retirement System, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund Of Chicago and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Triangle T Partners, LLC
Not Classified By Court: Tradition America LLC, Tullett Prebon Americas Corporation and tpSEF, Inc.
Interested Party: The New York Times Company
Petitioner: Lawrence W. Gardner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Genesee County Employees' Retirement System v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04089
Plaintiff: Genesee County Employees' Retirement System
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Kansas City, Missouri Employees' Retirement System v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04005
Plaintiff: Kansas City, Missouri Employees' Retirement System
Defendant: Bank Of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
In re SSA Bonds Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv03711
Plaintiff: Boston Retirement System, Alaska Department of Revenue, Treasury Division, Irving Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund and others
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A, Gary McDonald, BNP Paribas and others
Consolidated Defendant: Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., John Doe Defendants Nos. 1-100 and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: The Police Retirement System of St. Louis, City of Atlanta Firefighters Pension Fund, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Javelin Capital Markets LLC et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv03542
Defendant: Bank Of America Corporation, ICAP Capital Markets LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: Javelin Capital Markets LLC and Javelin SEF, LLC
Interested Party: The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Breakwater Trading LLC et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv03449
Plaintiff: Breakwater Trading LLC and BWT Professional Trading, LLC
Defendant: Bank Of America Corporation, Bank of Novia Scotia, New York Agency , Barclays Capital Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?