Cases 1 - 8 of 8
In Re: Local TV Advertising Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2018cv06785
In Re:
In Re: Local TV Advertising Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Cellino & Barnes, P.C., Walley's Auto Sales, Inc., Crowley Webb and Associates, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Tegna, Inc., Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., Hearst Communications, Inc. and others
Respondent:
The Nielsen Company (US), LLC
Special Master:
Richard Levie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. v. Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06758
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Tribune Media Company and Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. and One Source Heating & Cooling, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Ratulowski v. Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv05172
Plaintiff:
Betty Ratulowski
Defendant:
Bon-Ton Stores, Inc., Bon-Ton Distribution, LLC, doing business as Carson Pirie Scott and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv09743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
OSF Healthcare System v. Bon-Ton Stores Inc Employee Health Benefit Plan et al
as 1:2012cv01405
Plaintiff:
OSF Healthcare System
Defendant:
Bon-Ton Stores Inc Employee Health Benefit Plan, United Healthcare Insurance Company and Wynete Tyree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC. v. The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
as 1:2011cv07189
Plaintiff:
Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC.
Defendant:
The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kristich v. Bon Ton Stores, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01298
Plaintiff:
Craig Kristich
Defendant:
Bon Ton Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
