Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Fry v. Trump et al
as 1:2018cv00509
Petitioner:
James Nathan Fry
Respondent:
Donald J. Trump, Director of the BOP, Warden of FCI Englewood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pate v. Warden of FCI Eng. et al
as 1:2017cv02129
Petitioner:
Frank Edwin Pate
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Eng., Director of BOP, President of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Velasco v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2015cv02756
Plaintiff:
Ismael Lee Velasco
Defendant:
Hernandez, Maldonado, M.A. Stancil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) et al
as 1:2015cv02627
Plaintiff:
Antoine M. Bruce
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and F. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Shumard et al
as 1:2015cv01949
Plaintiff:
Carl Hall
Defendant:
Shumard, John Oliver and Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP")
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) et al
as 1:2015cv01780
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and F. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crump v. Central Office of General Counsel and Bureau of Prisons Federal North et al
as 1:2015cv01659
Plaintiff:
Norvell Webster Crump
Defendant:
Central Office of General Counsel and Bureau of Prisons Federal North, Central Regional Office, Agencie(s) of Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Administrations and Administrative Maximum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Thornton-Bey v. Cordova et al
as 1:2013cv03209
Plaintiff:
DeJuan B. Thornton-Bey
Defendant:
F. Cordova, T. W. Hall, S. Molivos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gowadia v. BOP et al
as 1:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Noshir Gowadia
Defendant:
BOP, Bobby L. Meeks, Blake R. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
