Cases 1 - 10 of 118
MAHUE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86343
Defendant:
BECHTEL CORPORATION, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TRUMAN JAMES MAHUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERKINS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86358
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., CRANE COMPANY, JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEAN v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86295
Defendant:
BECHTEL CORPORATION, 3M, OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ESWIN DEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86376
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., VIACOM, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
EQUILA THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODWARD v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86391
Defendant:
AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC., JOHN CRANE, BECHTEL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
BERTHA WOODWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JAMES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86324
Defendant:
3M, AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC., OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALLACE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86383
Defendant:
3M, IMO INDUSTRIES, CRANE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY M. WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVESTER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86396
Defendant:
D.B. RILEY, INC., BECHTEL CORPORATION, IMO INDUSTRIES and others
Plaintiff:
TODD EVESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NIX v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86355
Defendant:
IMO INDUSTRIES, VIACOM, INC., BECHTEL INC. doing business as BECHTEL INC. OF NEVADA also known as C & I GIRDLER COMPANY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BECHTEL, INC., ETC. and others
Plaintiff:
ERNEST L. NIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86323
Defendant:
BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION, MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TOMMY L. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.