Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Official Stanford Invstr Com, et al v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al
as 17-11114
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIS OF COLORADO, INCORPORATED, WILLIS LIMITED, WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED and others
Appellant:
BARRY L. RUPERT, CAROL RUPERT, MICHAEL RISHMAGUE and others
SEC, et al v. Stanford International Bank, et al
as 17-11073
Movant - Appellant:
BARRY L. RUPERT, CAROL RUPERT, MICHAEL RISHMAGUE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIS OF COLORADO, INCORPORATED, WILLIS, LIMITED, WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED and others
Barry Rupert, et al v. Robert Winter, et al
as 14-11119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY RUPERT, CAROL RUPERT, DAVID QUINTOS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT S. WINTER, BOWEN, MICLETTE & BRITT, INCORPORATED, also known as Bowen Miclette Descant & Britt, Incorporated, AMY S. BARANOUCKY and others
Miguel Rishmague, et al v. Robert Winter, et al
as 14-11118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL RISHMAGUE, Individually and on behalf of UCB Properties Trust and Inversiones Misanisa Trust and ODDE JALIL RISHMAGUE, Individually and on behalf of UCB Properties Trust and Inversiones Misanisa Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT S. WINTER, BOWEN, MICLETTE & BRITT, INCORPORATED, WILLIS OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED and others
Samuel Troice, et al v. Willis of Colorado Inc., et al
as 11-11048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL TROICE, PUNGA PUNGA FINANCIAL, LIMITED, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, PROMOTORA VILLA MARINO, CA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIS OF COLORADO INCORPORATED, WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED, AMY S. BARANOUCKY and others
Appellee:
MARK DANIEL MANELA
Endurance American Specialty v. Bowen, Miclette & Britt, Inc., et al
as 10-20091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ENDURANCE AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
BOWEN, MICLETTE & BRITT, INCORPORATED and ROBERT S. WINTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
