Cases 1 - 10 of 293
Fraley v. United States of America
as 1:2024mi00033
Plaintiff:
Natasha Brown Fraley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Anabui v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv01811
Plaintiff:
Loretta Anabui
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Micah Brown
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ESI, Inc. of Tennessee v. Brown & Root Industrial Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
ESI, Inc. of Tennessee
Defendant:
Brown & Root Industrial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0003 Application to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Vinayagam v. US Dept Labor-Adminisrative Review Board et al
as 1:2024cv01060
Plaintiff:
Nithya Vinayagam
Defendant:
US Dept Labor-Adminisrative Review Board, Swapna Pasham, EIS Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Brown v. Netspend Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
Netspend Corporation and Republic Bank and Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
