Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pretty Bird Pictures Inc. et al v. CARTER et al
as 2:2017xc01056
Defendant:
CARTER, Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., Khalif Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Pretty Bird Pictures Inc, Anthony Barre and Angel Barre
Not Classified By Court:
Oakland 13 Music and Melina Mastoukas
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Pretty Bird Pictures Inc. et al v. CARTER et al
as 2:2017cv01056
Plaintiff:
Angel Barre and Anthony Barre
Defendant:
Beyonce Knowles Carter, Parkwood Entertainment, LLC, Sony Music Entertainment, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Barre et al v. Carter et al
as 2:2017cv01057
Defendant:
Sony Music Entertainment , Pretty Bird Pictures Inc. , Beyonce Knowles Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Barre and Anthony Barre
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Estate of Anthony Barre et al v. CARTER et al
as 2:2017cv01055
Plaintiff:
Angel Barre and Anthony Barre
Defendant:
Beyonce Knowles Carter, Parkwood Entertainment, LLC, Sony Music Entertainment Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
The Shaw Group Inc v. Shaw Capital, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00378
Defendant:
J. M. Bernhard, Jr., George Bevan, Russell Brown and others
Plaintiff:
The Shaw Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Capital Lodging LLC v. Brown et al
as 2:2012cv00467
Plaintiff:
Capital Lodging LLC
Defendant:
Richard Brown, Laurie McCarthy, Morgan Chase Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Diaz v. Brown
as 2:2011cv01127
Plaintiff:
Carroll Gene Diaz
Defendant:
Daniel P. Brown
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 172
Shell Trademark Management BV et al v. Three Rivers Investments Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv05441
Plaintiff:
Shell Trademark Management BV, Shell Trademark Management BV, Motiva Enterprises LLC and others
Defendant:
Three Rivers Investments Inc. and Stanley Brown
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
