Other Statutes Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Kurt Kanam, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 24-5003
Plaintiff: Kurt Kanam, in his capacity as Chairman of the Pilchuck Nation and Pilchuck Nation
Defendant: Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his official capacity as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs, Darryl LaCounte, in his official capacity as Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Francisco Martinez v. DOJ, et al
as 23-5270
Plaintiff / Appellant: Francisco E. Martinez
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Justice, National Security Agency, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
TAYLOR v. BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00850
Plaintiff: ERIC EMANUEL TAYLOR
Defendant: BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Julia Cavazos, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-5084
Plaintiff / Appellant: Julia Cavazos, Nancy Cisneros, Debra Cicalo and others
Defendant / Appellee: Debra A. Haaland, in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs of the Department of the Interior and Darryl LaCounte, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs
Intervenor / Appellee: Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan
Julia Cavazos, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-5061
Plaintiff / Appellee: Julia Cavazos, Nancy Cisneros, Debra Cicalo and others
Defendant / Appellant: Debra A. Haaland, in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs of the Department of the Interior and Darryl LaCounte, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs
Intervenor / Appellee: Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan
KANAM et al v. HAALAND et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01690
Plaintiff: Pilchuck Nation and KURT KANAM
Defendant: DEB HAALAND, BRYAN NEWLAND, DARRYL LACOUNTE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Eastern Band of Cherokee, et al v. DOI, et al
as 21-5126
Defendant / Appellee: Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, United States Department of the Interior, Tara Katuk Mac Lean Sweeney, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Sonya A. Beaty, Donna M. Landers, James Edward McLeymore and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: Catawba Indian Nation
Not Yet Classified: Cherokee Nation
Eastern Band of Cherokee, et al v. DOI, et al
as 21-5114
Plaintiff / Appellant: Wanda Clark, Jason C. McLeymore, John Charles McLeymore and others
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of the Interior, R. Glenn Melville, in his official capacity as Acting Regional Director for the Bureau of Indian Affairs Eastern Regional Office, United States Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: Catawba Indian Nation
Not Yet Classified: Cherokee Nation
MURDER ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2020cv03186
Plaintiff: MURDER ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Gerald Hawkins, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5074
Plaintiff / Appellant: Rascal Ranch, LLC, Troy Brooks, Franklin J. Melsness and others
Defendant / Appellee: David Longly Bernhardt, Secretary of the Interior, Bryan Mercier, Regional Director, U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs, Northwest Regional office, Tara Katuk Mac Lean Sweeney, Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?