Cases 1 - 7 of 7
BancorpSouth Bank, Inc. v. Dios et al
as 1:2013cv00248
Plaintiff:
BancorpSouth Bank, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael F. Dios and Judith A. Dios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
E.J. Saad, P.C. v. Hinkle Metals & Supply Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
E.J. Saad, P.C.
Defendant:
Hinkle Metals & Supply Co., Inc. , Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service and BancorpSouth Bank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Air Comfort Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00358
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Air Comfort Company, Inc. , Stanley E. Small and Helen M. Small
Intervenor:
BancorpSouth Bank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank National Association v. Bancorpsouth Bank, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00226
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Bancorpsouth Bank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BankcorpSouth Bank v. Long Branch, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00156
Plaintiff:
BancorpSouth Bank, BancorpSouth Bank, BancorpSouth Bank and others
Defendant:
Long Branch, LLC, REI Properties of Alabama, LLC, Shelby Homebuilders, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Aurora National Life Assurance Company v. Birmingham Electric Battery Company, Inc et al
as 2:2007cv01996
Plaintiff:
Aurora National Life Assurance Company and Aurora National Life Assurance Company
Defendant:
Birmingham Electric Battery Company, Inc, Marie Henley Duffee, David H Duffee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
RLI Insurance Company v. Stephens et al
as 2:2007cv00465
Plaintiff:
RLI Insurance Company, RLI Insurance Company and RLI Insurance Company
Defendant:
Charles H Stephens and Floy Stephens
Garnishee:
Renasant Bank, ServisFirst Bank, Compass Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
