Cases 31 - 40 of 115
Hartman Design Inc. v. Ted's Jobs Bank, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00416
Plaintiff:
Hartman Design Inc.
Defendant:
Ted's Jobs Bank, Inc. and Ted J. Greiner
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Yesh Music, LLC v. Grand Banks Yachts Ltd.
as 1:2017cv05705
Defendant:
Grand Banks Yachts Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Yesh Music, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Bank v. IMDB.COM, Inc.
as 1:2017cv05240
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bank
Defendant:
IMDB.COM, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Eastern Savings Bank
as 3:2017cv00708
Plaintiff:
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Eastern Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. et al v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
as 1:2017cv01508
Plaintiff:
Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. and Energy Intelligence Group (UK) Limited
Defendant:
Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Verify Smart Corp. v. First Republic Bank
as 1:2016cv09078
Plaintiff:
Verify Smart Corp.
Defendant:
First Republic Bank
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hedgeye Risk Management LLC v. Bank of Montreal et al
as 1:2016cv04842
Plaintiff:
Hedgeye Risk Management LLC
Defendant:
Bank of Montreal, BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. and Joel Jackson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. v. MUFG Union Bank, N.A.
as 1:2016cv03652
Plaintiff:
Energy Intelligence Group, Inc.
Defendant:
MUFG Union Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Noah Bank v. Noa Bank et al
as 1:2016cv02716
Plaintiff:
Noah Bank
Defendant:
Noa Bank, Jung Ho Kim, David Suh and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. et al v. Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank
as 1:2016cv02155
Plaintiff:
Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. and Energy Intelligence Group (UK) Limited
Defendant:
Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
