Cases 1 - 10 of 407
v. SOPKIN et al
as 1:2024cv00743
Not Yet Classified:
BARBARA SOPKIN and JOHN LOPATTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
24 HOUR EXPRESS LLC et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
24 HOUR EXPRESS LLC and BARBARA LUCIA DE MELO RABELO
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and CONNIE NOLAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Barbara Palmer v. FEC
as 23-5216
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Barbara W. Palmer
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Election Commission
Barbara Sopkin v. John Lopatto, III
as 23-7115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Barbara Sopkin
Defendant / Appellee:
John S. Lopatto, III
Abdul Mohammed v. Christopher Cooper, et al
as 23-5167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdul Azeem Mohammed
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher R. Cooper, Beryl A. Howell, James E. Boasberg and others
DINAPOLI et al v. BECERRA et al
as 1:2023cv01799
Plaintiff:
ANGELA DINAPOLI, ANGGIA HAJAR, ARCELIA BROWN and others
Petitioner:
CYNTHIA MORRIS
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHAND HUMAN SERVICES, HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, COUNTERMEASURES INJURY COMPENSATION PROGRAM, US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAD SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
MOHAMMED v. COOPER et al
as 1:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MOHAMMED
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER COOPER, BERYL A. HOWELL, JAMES BOASBERG and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
