Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Dixon v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2020cv02256
Defendant:
CR Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
Naomi Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FULTON v. BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv01316
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA FULTON
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Devries v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv01313
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, Does1 Through 100 Inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Devries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paprocki v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv05207
Plaintiff:
Andrea Paprocki
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc, McKesson Corporation, Does1 Through 100 Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Perkins v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv05208
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, Does1 Through 100 Inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Anna Perkins
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Dean v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv05226
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Winifred Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv05189
Plaintiff:
Nathan Young
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R BARD INC, Does 1 through 100 Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv03229
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gentile v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv05143
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, C R BARD INC, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Gentile
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Penn v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv01311
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, C R Bard Inc, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Gail Penn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
