Cases 1 - 10 of 12
20230930-DK-Butterfly-1, Inc. v. HBC Investments LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03370
Plaintiff:
20230930-DK-Butterfly-1, Inc. and Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
Defendant:
HBC Investments LLC and Hudson Bay Capital Management LP
Cohen v. Cohen et al
as 1:2022cv09733
Plaintiff:
Judith Cohen
Defendant:
Ryan Cohen and RC VENTURES LLC
Nominal Defendant:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
IN RE BED BATH & BEYOND INC. SECTION 16(b) LITIGATION
as 1:2022cv09327
Plaintiff:
Todd Augenbaum
Defendant:
RC VENTURES LLC and Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Judith Cohen
Consolidated Defendant:
Ryan Cohen
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv02540
Not Classified By Court:
BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
SI v. BED BATH & BEYOND CORPORATION et al
as 1:2022cv02541
Lead Plaintiff:
SI PENGCHENG
Defendant:
BED BATH & BEYOND, INC., RC VENTURES LLC, RYAN COHEN and others
Plaintiff:
PENGCHENG SI
MANTIA v. FLEMING et al
as 2:2020cv09763
Defendant:
VIRGINIA P. RUESTERHOLZ, JOHNATHAN B. OSBORNE, MARK J. TRITTON and others
Plaintiff:
GREG MANTIA
GROOMS v. TRITTON et al
as 2:2020cv09610
Defendant:
HARRIET EDELMAN, HARSHA RAMALINGAM, STEPHANIE BELL-ROSE and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN GROOMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
IN RE BED BATH & BEYOND STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 2:2020cv08673
Defendant:
VIRGINIA P. RUESTERHOLZ, JOHNATHAN B. OSBORNE, HARRIET EDELMAN and others
Plaintiff:
OLUFEMI SALU
Consolidated Plaintiff:
KEVIN GROOMS and GREG MANTIA
KIRKLAND v. BED BATH & BEYOND INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05339
Defendant:
MARY A. WINSTON, MARK J TRITTON, BED BATH & BEYOND INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JERRY KIRKLAND
Petitioner:
SHAWN RUEBUSH and Kavin Bakhda
VITIELLO et al v. BED BATH & BEYOND INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04240
Defendant:
MARY A. WINSTON, ROBYN M. D'ELIA, MARK J TRITTON and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN VITIELLO and JUNE VITIELLO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
