Cases 1 - 8 of 8
McGoldrick et. al. v. Davol, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2020cv04116
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Benton Dickinson Enterprises Incorporated and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael McGoldrick and Anne Marie McGoldrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lentino et. al. v. Davol, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2020cv04114
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Benton Dickinson Enterprises Incorporated and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Lentino and Kimberly Lentino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lentino et. al. v. Davol, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2019cv06694
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Benton Dickinson Enterprises Incorporated and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Lentino and Kimberly Lentino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McGoldrick et. al. v. Davol, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2019cv05529
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Benton Dickinson Enterprises Incorporated and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael McGoldrick and Anne Marie McGoldrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McGoldrick et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05529
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Benton Dickinson Enterprises Incorporated and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael McGoldrick and Anne Marie McGoldrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Demos et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00926
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Benton Dickinson Enterprises Incorporated and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Theodore Demos and Elizabeth Demos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Demos et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03874
Defendant:
Benton Dickinson Enterprises Incorporated, C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Demos and Theodore Demos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Demos et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03874
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Benton Dickinson Enterprises Incorporated and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Theodore Demos and Elizabeth Demos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
