Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Bettis et al v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv13143
Plaintiff:
Mirielle Bettis, Eric Bush-Anderson, Billy Fleming and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Crosby et al v. Liberty Home Equity Solutions et al
as 3:2017cv13589
Plaintiff:
Walter G Crosby and Betty Crosby
Defendant:
Liberty Home Equity Solutions and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv10394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Steinberg v. Feintuch et al
as 2:2016cv12450
Plaintiff:
Stan Steinberg
Defendant:
Betty Feintuch , Sycamore Holdings, LLC , BF Schirm Farms, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Black Hawk Recovery et al
as 2:2015cv10143
Plaintiff:
Betty June Taylor
Defendant:
Black Hawk Recovery, Credit Acceptance Corporation and United States Bankruptcy Court
Taylor v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2014cv13379
Plaintiff:
Betty June Taylor
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Department of Treasury and Michigan Department of State
Taylor El v. U.S. Government et al
as 2:2014cv12365
Plaintiff:
Betty June Taylor El
Defendant:
U.S. Government, Wayne, County of and Wayne County Treasurer
Taylor v. U.S. Government et al
as 2:2014cv12143
Plaintiff:
Betty June Taylor
Defendant:
U.S. Government and Detroit, City of
Taylor v. Credit Acceptance Corporation et al
as 5:2014cv11031
Plaintiff:
Betty June Taylor
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation and United States Government
Hotchkiss et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2012cv12268
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Hotchkiss and Cyde Hotchkiss
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
