Cases
Frank et al v. Walker et al
as 3:2020cv00768
Plaintiff: Shirley Brown, Sarah Lahti, Nancy Lea Wilde and others
Defendant: Thomas Cane, Mark L. Thomsen, Beverly R Gill and others
Amicus Curiae: United States Justice Foundation, Matthew Augustine, Erin M Decker and others
Intervenor Defendant: The Wisconsin Legislature
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robin J. Vos v. Kenneth F. Ripple, et al
as 19-1910
Respondent: WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, KENNETH F. RIPPLE and JAMES D. PETERSON
Interested Party: ROGER ANCLAM, MARY LYNNE DONOHUE, EMILY BUNTING and others
Petitioner: ROBIN J. VOS, Speaker
The Wisconsin Assembly Democratic Campaign Committee v. Gill, Beverly et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00763
Defendant: Mark L. Thomsen, Dean Knudson, Ann S. Jacobs and others
Plaintiff: The Wisconsin Assembly Democratic Campaign Committee
Intervenor: Wisconsin State Assembly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
One Wisconsin Institute, Inc., et al v. Mark Thomsen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3091
Plaintiff - Appellee: ONE WISCONSIN INSTITUTE, INC., RENEE M. GAGNER, ANITA JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Appellant: MARK L. THOMSEN, ANN S. JACOBS, BEVERLY R. GILL and others
One Wisconsin Institute, Inc., et al v. Mark Thomsen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3083
Plaintiff - Appellant: ONE WISCONSIN INSTITUTE, INC., CITIZEN ACTION OF WISCONSIN EDUCATION FUND, INC., RENEE M. GAGNER and others
Defendant - Appellee: MARK L. THOMSEN, ANN S. JACOBS, BEVERLY R. GILL and others
Ruthelle Frank, et al v. Scott Walker, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3003
Plaintiff - Appellee: RUTHELLE FRANK, JUSTIN LUFT, DARTRIC DAVIS and others
Defendant - Appellant: SCOTT WALKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Wisconsin, MARK L. THOMSEN, ANN S. JACOBS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?